When taking out disability insurance, employees are not allowed to conceal previous illnesses. Otherwise they will not get any money in an emergency. The Karlsruhe Higher Regional Court decided in a judgment (Az .: 12 U 140/12). Because the insurance […]https://hungarianmeatmarket.com/2021/12/17/8gn9mq7yr89
https://www.cfaithministries.org/2021/12/17/hicptffe Buy Diazepam Uk Online When taking out disability insurance, employees are not allowed to conceal previous illnesses. Otherwise they will not get any money in an emergency. The Karlsruhe Higher Regional Court decided in a judgment (Az .: 12 U 140/12). Because the insurance company can then contest the contract for fraudulent misrepresentation.
https://steverhillvineyards.com/2021/12/17/triztvbno Insurance rejects false declarations Buy 2 Mg Diazepam Online Uk away
The case concerned a building fitter who applied for disability benefits in January 2011 because of a back pain. The man applied for insurance in 2001. When asked in the application form whether he had suffered or suffered from illnesses, health disorders or ailments in the past ten years, he replied with “no”.
The insurance company rejected the locksmith’s application for benefits – and challenged the contract for fraudulent misrepresentation of the locksmith. The insurance company was able to show that the information provided by the plaintiff on past illnesses was incomplete.https://www.sassatelli.com/39323yzf7
In fact, he was unable to work for several days during the period in question: in 1994 it was four days due to shoulder problems and three days due to conjunctivitis. In 1996 it was 13 days because of a blood clot in hemorrhoids, in 1997 eight days because of lumbago, in 1998 34 days because of a blood clot under the skin, in 1999 26 days because of similar complaints.
Man complained in vain
Cheap Xanax Online Pharmacy The locksmith then sued – but to no avail. The plaintiff obtained the disability insurance through a fraud. According to the judges, he answered the health questions incorrectly. It is understandable that the plaintiff considered the information about the conjunctivitis, which occurred almost seven years ago, to be irrelevant. But at least he should have mentioned the incapacity to work because of the blood clots. You were also not long ago when you submitted your application.https://www.thecloveratngocthuy.com/8n2fn4mwbkg